IECE - Institute of Emerging and Computer Engineers

  • Sign Up Log in
    Log in

    • -
    CiteScore
    2.29
    Impact Factor
    1. Home
    2. Journals
    3. IECE Transactions on Internet of Things
    4. Volume 2, Issue 1
    Volume 2, Issue 1, IECE Transactions on Internet of Things
    Volume 2, Issue 1, 2024
    Submit Manuscript Edit a Special Issue
    Academic Editor
    Jinchao Chen
    Jinchao Chen
    School of Computer Science, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710129, China
    Article QR Code
    Article QR Code
    Scan the QR code for reading
    Popular articles
    Research on A Ship Trajectory Classification Method Based on Deep Learning YOLOv7-Bw: A Dense Small Object Efficient Detector Based on Remote Sensing Image Deep Prediction Network Based on Covariance Intersection Fusion for Sensor Data A Mimic Fusion Algorithm for Dual Channel Video Based on Possibility Distribution Synthesis Theory Bridging Modalities: A Survey of Cross-Modal Image-Text Retrieval Visual Feature Extraction and Tracking Method Based on Corner Flow Detection Inaugural Editorial of the Chinese Journal of Information Fusion Simultaneous Spatiotemporal Bias Compensation and Data Fusion for Asynchronous Multisensor Systems YOLOv8-Lite: A Lightweight Object Detection Model for Real-time Autonomous Driving Systems Extraction of Motion Information from Occupancy Grid Map Using Keystone Transform
    IECE Transactions on Internet of Things, 2024, Volume 2, Issue 1: 8-19

    Free to Read | Research Article | 14 January 2024
    3D Convolutional Neural Network-Based Multi-Parameter Video Quality Assessment Model on Cloud Platforms
    by
    IECE Author Xue Li 1 *
    IECE Author Jiali Qiu 2
    1 Xidian University, Xi'an 710126, China
    2 Xi'an Jiaotong University,Xi'an 710049, China
    * Corresponding Author: Xue Li, [email protected]
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.62762/TIOT.2024.369369
    Received: 17 November 2023, Accepted: 03 January 2024, Published: 14 January 2024  
       PDF  (1.47 MB)
    Article Metrics Cite This Article
    Abstract
    In light of the rapid advancements in big data and artificial intelligence technologies, the trend of uploading local files to cloud servers to mitigate local storage limitations is growing. However, the surge of duplicate files, especially images and videos, results in significant network bandwidth wastage and complicates server management. To tackle these issues, we have developed a multi-parameter video quality assessment model utilizing a 3D convolutional neural network within a video deduplication framework. Our method, inspired by the analytic hierarchy process, thoroughly evaluates the effects of packet loss rate, codec, frame rate, bit rate, and resolution on video quality. The model employs a two-stream 3D convolutional neural network to integrate spatial and temporal streams for capturing video distortion details, with a coding layer configured to remove redundant distortion information. We validated our approach using the LIVE and CSIQ datasets, comparing its performance against the V-BLIINDS and VIDEO schemes across different packet loss rates. Furthermore, we simulated the client-server interaction using a subset of the dataset and assessed the scheme's time efficiency. Our results indicate that the proposed scheme offers a highly efficient solution for video quality assessment.
    Graphical Abstract
    3D Convolutional Neural Network-Based Multi-Parameter Video Quality Assessment Model on Cloud Platforms
    Keywords
    Video quality assessment
    3D CNN
    Packet loss rate
    SRCC
    PLCC
    Funding
    This work was supported without any funding.
    Cite This Article
    APA Style
    Li, X., & Qiu, J. (2024). 3D Convolutional Neural Network-Based Multi-Parameter Video Quality Assessment Model on Cloud Platforms. IECE Transactions on Internet of Things, 2(1), 8–19 https://doi.org/10.62762/TIOT.2024.369369
    References
    1. Yang, X., Lu, R., Choo, K. K. R., Yin, F., & Tang, X. (2017). Achieving efficient and privacy-preserving cross-domain big data deduplication in cloud. IEEE Transactions on Big Data, 8(1), 73-84.
      [Google Scholar]
    2. Wu, X., Hauptmann, A. G., & Ngo, C. W. (2007, September). Practical elimination of near-duplicates from web video search. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM international conference on Multimedia (pp. 218-227).
      [Google Scholar]
    3. Yao, J. Y., & Liu, G. (2018). Bitrate-based no-reference video quality assessment combining the visual perception of video contents. IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, 65(3), 546-557.
      [Google Scholar]
    4. Botia Valderrama, D. J. L., & Gaviria Gómez, N. (2016). Nonintrusive method based on neural networks for video quality of experience assessment. Advances in Multimedia, 2016(1), 1730814.
      [Google Scholar]
    5. Søgaard, J., Forchhammer, S., & Korhonen, J. (2015, May). Video quality assessment and machine learning: Performance and interpretability. In 2015 Seventh International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
      [Google Scholar]
    6. Seshadrinathan, K., Soundararajan, R., Bovik, A. C., & Cormack, L. K. (2010, February). A subjective study to evaluate video quality assessment algorithms. In Human Vision and Electronic Imaging XV (Vol. 7527, pp. 128-137). SPIE.
      [Google Scholar]
    7. Saad, M. A., Bovik, A. C., & Charrier, C. (2014). Blind prediction of natural video quality. IEEE Transactions on image Processing, 23(3), 1352-1365.
      [Google Scholar]
    8. Mittal, A., Soundararajan, R., & Bovik, A. C. (2012). Making a “completely blind” image quality analyzer. IEEE Signal processing letters, 20(3), 209-212.
      [Google Scholar]
    9. Loh, W. T., & Bong, D. B. L. (2018). A just noticeable difference-based video quality assessment method with low computational complexity. Sensing and Imaging, 19, 1-20.
      [Google Scholar]
    10. Cheng, Z., Ding, L., Huang, W., Yang, F., & Qian, L. (2017, June). A unified QoE prediction framework for HEVC encoded video streaming over wireless networks. In 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting (BMSB) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
      [Google Scholar]
    11. Anegekuh, L., Sun, L., Jammeh, E., Mkwawa, I. H., & Ifeachor, E. (2015). Content-based video quality prediction for HEVC encoded videos streamed over packet networks. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 17(8), 1323-1334.
      [Google Scholar]
    12. Alreshoodi, M., Adeyemi-Ejeye, A. O., Woods, J., & Walker, S. D. (2015). Fuzzy logic inference system-based hybrid quality prediction model for wireless 4kUHD H. 265-coded video streaming. IET Networks, 4(6), 296-303.
      [Google Scholar]
    13. Zhang, Y., Gao, X., He, L., Lu, W., & He, R. (2018). Blind video quality assessment with weakly supervised learning and resampling strategy. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 29(8), 2244-2255.
      [Google Scholar]
    14. Valderrama, J. F. B., & Valderrama, D. J. L. B. (2018). On LAMDA clustering method based on typicality degree and intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Expert Systems with Applications, 107, 196-221.
      [Google Scholar]
    15. Li, Y., Po, L. M., Cheung, C. H., Xu, X., Feng, L., Yuan, F., & Cheung, K. W. (2015). No-reference video quality assessment with 3D shearlet transform and convolutional neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 26(6), 1044-1057.
      [Google Scholar]
    16. Agarla, M., Celona, L., & Schettini, R. (2020). No-reference quality assessment of in-capture distorted videos. Journal of Imaging, 6(8), 74.
      [Google Scholar]
    17. Nightingale, J., Salva-Garcia, P., Calero, J. M. A., & Wang, Q. (2018). 5G-QoE: QoE modelling for ultra-HD video streaming in 5G networks. IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, 64(2), 621-634.
      [Google Scholar]
    18. Narwaria, M., & Lin, W. (2011, September). Machine learning based modeling of spatial and temporal factors for video quality assessment. In 2011 18th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (pp. 2513-2516). IEEE.
      [Google Scholar]
    19. Pal, D., & Vanijja, V. (2017). A No-Reference Modular Video Quality Prediction Model for H. 265/HEVC and VP9 Codecs on a Mobile Device. Advances in Multimedia, 2017(1), 8317590.
      [Google Scholar]
    20. Qian, L., Pan, T., Zheng, Y., Zhang, J., Li, M., Yu, B., & Wang, B. (2020). No-Reference Nonuniform Distorted Video Quality Assessment Based on Deep Multiple Instance Learning. IEEE MultiMedia, 28(1), 28-37.
      [Google Scholar]
    21. Chen, P., Li, L., Ma, L., Wu, J., & Shi, G. (2020, October). RIRNet: Recurrent-in-recurrent network for video quality assessment. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM international conference on multimedia (pp. 834-842).
      [Google Scholar]
    22. Li, D., Jiang, T., & Jiang, M. (2021). Unified quality assessment of in-the-wild videos with mixed datasets training. International Journal of Computer Vision, 129(4), 1238-1257.
      [Google Scholar]
    23. Zhen, P., Chen, H. B., Cheng, Y., Ji, Z., Liu, B., & Yu, H. (2021). Fast video facial expression recognition by a deeply tensor-compressed LSTM neural network for mobile devices. ACM Transactions on Internet of Things, 2(4), 1-26.
      [Google Scholar]
    24. Wang, N., Fang, F., & Feng, M. (2014, May). Multi-objective optimal analysis of comfort and energy management for intelligent buildings. In The 26th Chinese control and decision conference (2014 CCDC) (pp. 2783-2788). IEEE.
      [Google Scholar]
    25. Fang, F. A. N. G., Tan, W., & Liu, J. Z. (2005). Tuning of coordinated controllers for boiler-turbine units. Acta Automatica Sinica, 31(2), 291-296.
      [Google Scholar]
    26. Fang, F., Jizhen, L., & Wen, T. (2004). Nonlinear internal model control for the boiler-turbine coordinate systems of power unit. PROCEEDINGS-CHINESE SOCIETY OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, 24(4), 195-199.
      [Google Scholar]
    27. Lv, Y., Fang, F. A. N. G., Yang, T., & Romero, C. E. (2020). An early fault detection method for induced draft fans based on MSET with informative memory matrix selection. ISA transactions, 102, 325-334.
      [Google Scholar]
    Article Metrics
    Citations:

    Google Scholar
    0

    Crossref

    0

    Scopus

    0

    Web of Science

    0
    Article Access Statistics:
    Views: 1933
    PDF Downloads: 230
    Publisher's Note
    IECE stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
    Rights and permissions
    Institute of Emerging and Computer Engineers (IECE) or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
    IECE Transactions on Internet of Things

    IECE Transactions on Internet of Things

    ISSN: 2996-9298 (Online)

    Email: [email protected]

    Portico

    Portico

    All published articles are preserved here permanently:
    https://www.portico.org/publishers/iece/

    Copyright © 2024 Institute of Emerging and Computer Engineers Inc.