Chinese Journal of Information Fusion
ISSN: 2998-3371 (Online) | ISSN: 2998-3363 (Print)
Email: [email protected]
[1]Zhang, M., Dong, L., Ma, D., & Xu, W. (2022). Infrared target detection in marine images with heavy waves via local patch similarity. Infrared Physics & Technology, 125, 104283.
[2]Ma, J., Ma, Y., & Li, C. (2019). Infrared and visible image fusion methods and applications: A survey. Information fusion, 45, 153-178.
[3]Chen, J., Li, X., Luo, L., Mei, X., & Ma, J. (2020). Infrared and visible image fusion based on target-enhanced multiscale transform decomposition. Information Sciences, 508, 64-78.
[4]Li, H., Wu, X. J., & Kittler, J. (2020). MDLatLRR: A novel decomposition method for infrared and visible image fusion. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 29, 4733-4746.
[5]Fu, Z., Wang, X., Xu, J., Zhou, N., & Zhao, Y. (2016). Infrared and visible images fusion based on RPCA and NSCT. Infrared Physics & Technology, 77, 114-123.
[6]Zhang, Q., Wang, Y., Levine, M. D., Yuan, X., & Wang, L. (2015). Multisensor video fusion based on higher order singular value decomposition. Information Fusion, 24, 54-71.
[7]Zhang, Q., Wang, L., Ma, Z., & Li, H. (2012). A novel video fusion framework using surfacelet transform. Optics Communications, 285(13-14), 3032-3041.
[8]Guo, X., Ji, L., & Yang, F. (2021). Dual-mode Infrared Image Fusion Algorithm Selection Based on Possibility Information Quality Synthesis. Acta Photonica Sinica, 50(3), 167.
[9]Guo, X., Yang, F., & Ji, L. (2022). MLF: A mimic layered fusion method for infrared and visible video. Infrared Physics & Technology, 126, 104349.
[10]Yang, F. B. (2017). Research on theory and model of mimic fusion between infrared polarization and intensity images. Journal of North University of China (Natural Science Edition), 38(1), 1-8.
[11]Hanlon, R. T., Conroy, L. A., & Forsythe, J. W. (2008). Mimicry and foraging behaviour of two tropical sand-flat octopus species off North Sulawesi, Indonesia. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 93(1), 23-38.
[12]Ishida, T. (2021). A model of octopus epidermis pattern mimicry mechanisms using inverse operation of the Turing reaction model. Plos one, 16(8), e0256025.
[13]Hochberg, F. G., Norman, M. D., & Finn, J. (2006). Wunderpus photogenicus n. gen. and sp., a new octopus from the shallow waters of the Indo-Malayan Archipelago (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae). Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine, 73(8).
[14]Tomita, M., & Aoki, S. (2014). Visual Discrimination Learning in the Small Octopus O ctopus ocellatus. Ethology, 120(9), 863-872.
[15]Hu, H., Wu, J., Wang, Z., & Cheng, G. (2018). Mimic defense: a designed‐in cybersecurity defense framework. IET Information Security, 12(3), 226-237.
[16]Y.Z. Gao, J.M. Wang, Z.Y. Lei, et al. Method of mimicry signal processing for distributed opportunity array radar, Modern Radar 43(11) (2021) 1-8.
[17]D.F. Xu. Research on biomimetic Robot inspired by mimicry of octopus, Hangzhou Dianzi University, (2018)1-15.
[18]Guo, X., Yang, F., & Ji, L. (2023). A mimic fusion method based on difference feature association falling shadow for infrared and visible video. Infrared Physics & Technology, 132, 104721.
[19]Mack, Y. P., & Rosenblatt, M. (1979). Multivariate k-nearest neighbor density estimates. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 9(1), 1-15.
[20]Langrené, N., & Warin, X. (2019). Fast and stable multivariate kernel density estimation by fast sum updating. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 28(3), 596-608.
[21]Wang, J. (2013). Pearson correlation coefficient. Encyclopedia of systems biology, 1671.
[22]Bouhamed, S. A., Kallel, I. K., Yager, R. R., Bossé, É., & Solaiman, B. (2020). An intelligent quality-based approach to fusing multi-source possibilistic information. Information Fusion, 55, 68-90.
[23]F. Yang, L. Ji, X. Wang, Possibility Theory and Application, Science Press, Beijing, (2019) 41-45.
[24]Ali, F. E., El-Dokany, I. M., Saad, A. A., & Abd El-Samie, F. E. (2010). A curvelet transform approach for the fusion of MR and CT images. Journal of Modern Optics, 57(4), 273-286.
[25]Cheng, B., Jin, L., & Li, G. (2018). General fusion method for infrared and visual images via latent low-rank representation and local non-subsampled shearlet transform. Infrared Physics & Technology, 92, 68-77.
[26]LIU, D., ZHOU, D., NIE, R., & HOU, R. (2018). Multi-focus image fusion based on phase congruency motivate pulse coupled neural network-based in NSCT domain. Journal of Computer Applications, 38(10), 3006.
[27]Bao, W., & Zhu, X. (2015). A novel remote sensing image fusion approach research based on HSV space and bi-orthogonal wavelet packet transform. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 43, 467-473.
[28]Bashir, R., Junejo, R., Qadri, N. N., Fleury, M., & Qadri, M. Y. (2019). SWT and PCA image fusion methods for multi-modal imagery. Multimedia tools and applications, 78, 1235-1263.
[29]Du, J., Li, W., Xiao, B., & Nawaz, Q. (2016). Union Laplacian pyramid with multiple features for medical image fusion. Neurocomputing, 194, 326-339.
[30]Aishwarya, N., & Thangammal, C. B. (2018). Visible and infrared image fusion using DTCWT and adaptive combined clustered dictionary. Infrared Physics \& Technology, 93, 300-309.
[31]Zhao, R., Liu, L., Kong, X., Jiang, S., & Chen, X. (2019). Multi-scale fusion algorithm of intensity and polarization-difference images based on edge information enhancement. Optical and Quantum Electronics, 51, 1-24.
[32]Wang, X., Yin, J., Zhang, K., Li, S., & Yan, J. (2019). Infrared weak-small targets fusion based on latent low-rank representation and DWT. IEEE Access, 7, 112681-112692.
[33]IEEE OTCBVS WS Series Bench. http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/OTCBVS-BENCH
[34]Toet, A. TNO Image fusion dataset. Figshare. data, 2014.
[35]Li, S., Yang, B., & Hu, J. (2011). Performance comparison of different multi-resolution transforms for image fusion. Information Fusion, 12(2), 74-84.
[36]Xydeas, C. S., & Petrovic, V. (2000). Objective image fusion performance measure. Electronics letters, 36(4), 308-309.
[37]Wang, Z., & Bovik, A. C. (2002). A universal image quality index. IEEE signal processing letters, 9(3), 81-84.
[38]Piella, G., & Heijmans, H. (2003, September). A new quality metric for image fusion. In Proceedings 2003 international conference on image processing (Cat. No. 03CH37429) (Vol. 3, pp. III-173). IEEE.
Chinese Journal of Information Fusion
ISSN: 2998-3371 (Online) | ISSN: 2998-3363 (Print)
Email: [email protected]
Portico
All published articles are preserved here permanently:
https://www.portico.org/publishers/iece/