Deep Prediction Network Based on Covariance Intersection Fusion for Sensor Data

Hanchi Ren; Yeqing Wang; Huijun Ma

doi:10.62762/TIS.2024.136898

CiteScore

1.44

Impact Factor

Volume 1, Issue 1, IECE Transactions on Intelligent Systematics

Volume 1, Issue 1, 2024

Submit Manuscript Edit a Special Issue

Academic Editor

Weimin Zhang

Beijing Institute of Technology, China

Article QR Code

Scan the QR code for reading

Popular articles

Research on A Ship Trajectory Classification Method Based on Deep Learning YOLOv7-Bw: A Dense Small Object Efficient Detector Based on Remote Sensing Image Deep Prediction Network Based on Covariance Intersection Fusion for Sensor Data A Mimic Fusion Algorithm for Dual Channel Video Based on Possibility Distribution Synthesis Theory Visual Feature Extraction and Tracking Method Based on Corner Flow Detection Bridging Modalities: A Survey of Cross-Modal Image-Text Retrieval Inaugural Editorial of the Chinese Journal of Information Fusion Simultaneous Spatiotemporal Bias Compensation and Data Fusion for Asynchronous Multisensor Systems YOLOv8-Lite: A Lightweight Object Detection Model for Real-time Autonomous Driving Systems Extraction of Motion Information from Occupancy Grid Map Using Keystone Transform

IECE Transactions on Intelligent Systematics, 2024, Volume 1, Issue 1: 10-18

Free to Read | Research Article | 25 May 2024

Deep Prediction Network Based on Covariance Intersection Fusion for Sensor Data

Hanchi Ren 1 *

Yeqing Wang 2

Huijun Ma 2

1 Department of Computer Science, Swansea University, Swansea SA1 8EN, United Kingdom

2 School of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China

* Corresponding Author: Hanchi Ren, [email protected]

DOI: https://doi.org/10.62762/TIS.2024.136898

Received: 05 January 2024, Accepted: 19 May 2024, Published: 25 May 2024

Cited by: 4 (Source: Web of Science) , 5 (Source: Google Scholar)

PDF (3.46 MB)

Article Metrics Cite This Article

Abstract

To predict future trends based on the data from sensors is an important technology for many applications, such as the Internet of Things, smart cities, etc. Based on the predicted results, further decisions and system controls can be made. Raw sensor data sets are often complex non-linear data with noise, which results in the difficulty of accurate prediction. This paper proposes a distributed deep prediction network based on a covariance intersection (CI) fusion algorithm in which the deep learning networks, such as long-term and short-term memory networks (LSTM) and gated recurrent unit networks (GRU) are fused by CI fusion algorithm to effectively develop the performance of prediction. Moreover, the variance is obtained to value the prediction results. The model is validated on the real weather dataset in Beijing. The experiments show that LSTM and GRU have their pros and cons for different data, CI fusion can develop the accuracy of the final predictions, and the entire framework has robust prediction results with a reasonable estimated variance.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Deep Prediction Network

Covariance Intersection (CI) Fusion

Sensor Data Analytics

Funding

This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 62173002.

Cite This Article

APA Style

Ren, H., Wang, Y., & Ma, H. (2024). Deep Prediction Network Based on Covariance Intersection Fusion for Sensor Data. IECE Transactions on Intelligent Systematics, 1(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.62762/TIS.2024.136898

References

Zhang, G. P. (2003). Time series forecasting using a hybrid ARIMA and neural network model. Neurocomputing, 50, 159-175.
[Google Scholar]
Thissen, U. V. B. R., Van Brakel, R., De Weijer, A. P., Melssen, W. J., & Buydens, L. M. C. (2003). Using support vector machines for time series prediction. Chemometrics and intelligent laboratory systems, 69(1-2), 35-49.
[Google Scholar]
Tay, F. E., & Cao, L. (2001). Application of support vector machines in financial time series forecasting. omega, 29(4), 309-317.
[Google Scholar]
Mikolov, T., Karafiát, M., Burget, L., Cernocký, J., & Khudanpur, S. (2010, September). Recurrent neural network based language model. In Interspeech (Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 1045-1048).
[Google Scholar]
Mikolov, T., Kombrink, S., Burget, L., Černocký, J., & Khudanpur, S. (2011, May). Extensions of recurrent neural network language model. In 2011 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP) (pp. 5528-5531). IEEE.
[Google Scholar]
Connor, J. T., Martin, R. D., & Atlas, L. E. (1994). Recurrent neural networks and robust time series prediction. IEEE transactions on neural networks, 5(2), 240-254.
[Google Scholar]
Gers, F. A., Schmidhuber, J., & Cummins, F. (2000). Learning to forget: Continual prediction with LSTM. Neural computation, 12(10), 2451-2471.
[Google Scholar]
Fu, R., Zhang, Z., & Li, L. (2016, November). Using LSTM and GRU neural network methods for traffic flow prediction. In 2016 31st Youth academic annual conference of Chinese association of automation (YAC) (pp. 324-328). IEEE.
[Google Scholar]
Malhotra, P., Vig, L., Shroff, G., & Agarwal, P. (2015, April). Long Short Term Memory Networks for Anomaly Detection in Time Series. In Esann (Vol. 2015, p. 89).
[Google Scholar]
Che, Z., Purushotham, S., Cho, K., Sontag, D., & Liu, Y. (2018). Recurrent neural networks for multivariate time series with missing values. Scientific reports, 8(1), 6085.
[Google Scholar]
Yao, S., Hu, S., Zhao, Y., Zhang, A., & Abdelzaher, T. (2017, April). Deepsense: A unified deep learning framework for time-series mobile sensing data processing. In Proceedings of the 26th international conference on world wide web (pp. 351-360).
[Google Scholar]
Osogami, T., Kajino, H., & Sekiyama, T. (2017, July). Bidirectional learning for time-series models with hidden units. In International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 2711-2720). PMLR.
[Google Scholar]
Wu, Y., & Tan, H. (2016). Short-term traffic flow forecasting with spatial-temporal correlation in a hybrid deep learning framework. arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.01022.
[Google Scholar]
Liu, Y., Zheng, H., Feng, X., & Chen, Z. (2017, October). Short-term traffic flow prediction with Conv-LSTM. In 2017 9th international conference on wireless communications and signal processing (WCSP) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
[Google Scholar]
Du, S., Li, T., Yang, Y., & Horng, S. J. (2019). Deep air quality forecasting using hybrid deep learning framework. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 33(6), 2412-2424.
[Google Scholar]
Kim, S., Hong, S., Joh, M., & Song, S. K. (2017). Deeprain: Convlstm network for precipitation prediction using multichannel radar data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.02316.
[Google Scholar]
Garcia, F., Mirbach, B., Ottersten, B., Grandidier, F., & Cuesta, A. (2010, September). Pixel weighted average strategy for depth sensor data fusion. In 2010 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (pp. 2805-2808). IEEE.
[Google Scholar]
Rojo, J., Rivero, R., Romero-Morte, J., Fernández-González, F., & Pérez-Badia, R. (2017). Modeling pollen time series using seasonal-trend decomposition procedure based on LOESS smoothing. International journal of biometeorology, 61, 335-348.
[Google Scholar]
Li, S., Kwok, J. T., & Wang, Y. (2002). Multifocus image fusion using artificial neural networks. Pattern recognition letters, 23(8), 985-997.
[Google Scholar]
Qiu, X., Ren, Y., Suganthan, P. N., & Amaratunga, G. A. (2017). Empirical mode decomposition based ensemble deep learning for load demand time series forecasting. Applied soft computing, 54, 246-255.
[Google Scholar]
Pu, L., Feng, X., & Hou, Z. (2019, May). Covariance intersection fusion for visual tracking with hierarchical features. In Tenth International Conference on Graphics and Image Processing (ICGIP 2018) (Vol. 11069, pp. 1158-1166). SPIE.
[Google Scholar]
Niehsen, W. (2002, July). Information fusion based on fast covariance intersection filtering. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information Fusion. FUSION 2002.(IEEE Cat. No. 02EX5997) (Vol. 2, pp. 901-904). IEEE.
[Google Scholar]
Hurley, M. B. (2002, July). An information theoretic justification for covariance intersection and its generalization. In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Information Fusion. FUSION 2002.(IEEE Cat. No. 02EX5997) (Vol. 1, pp. 505-511). IEEE.
[Google Scholar]
Julier, S., & Uhlmann, J. K. (2017). General decentralized data fusion with covariance intersection. In Handbook of multisensor data fusion (pp. 339-364). CRC Press.
[Google Scholar]
Gupta, M., & Gupta, B. (2018, August). An ensemble model for breast cancer prediction using sequential least squares programming method (slsqp). In 2018 eleventh international conference on contemporary computing (IC3) (pp. 1-3). IEEE.
[Google Scholar]

Article Metrics

Citations:

Google Scholar

Crossref

Scopus

Web of Science

Article Access Statistics:

PDF Downloads: 744

Publisher's Note

IECE stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

IECE or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

IECE Transactions on Intelligent Systematics

ISSN: 2998-3355 (Online) | ISSN: 2998-3320 (Print)

Email: [email protected]

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:
https://www.portico.org/publishers/iece/

Google Scholar

Crossref

Scopus

Web of Science

We use cookies