IECE Transactions on Social Statistics and Computing Home About Editors Current Issue
-
CiteScore
0.43
Impact Factor
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. IECE Transactions on Social Statistics and Computing
  4. Volume 1, Issue 2
Evolutionary Game Simulation Analysis of Government Supervision of Shadow Banking in China
Research Article | Published: 24 April 2024
IECE Transactions on Social Statistics and Computing Volume 1, Issue 2, 2024: 32-46
Volume 1, Issue 2, IECE Transactions on Social Statistics and Computing
Volume 1, Issue 2, 2024
Submit Manuscript Edit a Special Issue
Academic Editor
Hangyuan Guo
Hangyuan Guo
Innovation college, North-Chiang Mai University, Thailand
Article QR Code
Article QR Code
Scan the QR code for reading
Popular articles
Research on A Ship Trajectory Classification Method Based on Deep Learning YOLOv7-Bw: A Dense Small Object Efficient Detector Based on Remote Sensing Image A Mimic Fusion Algorithm for Dual Channel Video Based on Possibility Distribution Synthesis Theory Deep Prediction Network Based on Covariance Intersection Fusion for Sensor Data Bridging Modalities: A Survey of Cross-Modal Image-Text Retrieval Visual Feature Extraction and Tracking Method Based on Corner Flow Detection Inaugural Editorial of the Chinese Journal of Information Fusion Simultaneous Spatiotemporal Bias Compensation and Data Fusion for Asynchronous Multisensor Systems YOLOv8-Lite: A Lightweight Object Detection Model for Real-time Autonomous Driving Systems Extraction of Motion Information from Occupancy Grid Map Using Keystone Transform
IECE Transactions on Social Statistics and Computing, Volume 1, Issue 2, 2024: 32-46

Free to Read | Research Article | 24 April 2024
Evolutionary Game Simulation Analysis of Government Supervision of Shadow Banking in China
by
Ronghui Li Ronghui Li 1
Jianren Yang Jianren Yang 2 *
Yixin Yan Yixin Yan 2
1 Software Engineering Institute of Guangzhou, Guangzhou 510980, China
2 Jingdezhen Ceramic University, Jingdezhen 333403, China
* Corresponding Author: Jianren Yang, [email protected]
DOI: 10.62762/TSSC.2024.775392
Received: 21 March 2024, Accepted: 13 April 2024, Published: 24 April 2024  
   PDF  (1.06 MB)
Article Metrics Cite This Article
Abstract
Both the shadow banking and the government regulatory agencies are bounded rational subjects, and they will constantly adjust the game according to the change of the other party's strategy when making decisions. Therefore, it has become an effective way to explore the government regulatory issues of China's shadow banking with the application of evolutionary game theory. By constructing the evolutionary game model of shadow banking and government regulatory authorities, this paper analyzes the dynamic adjustment relationship between the strategy choice of shadow banking and government regulatory authorities, and concludes that the operating income and cost of shadow banking, the intensity of rewards and punishments and the supervision cost of government regulatory authorities are the important factors affecting the decision-making of the two. It is necessary to improve the information disclosure system of shadow banking, strengthen the reward and punishment mechanism for shadow banking, innovate the ways and methods of government supervision of shadow banking, smooth and improve the channels and mechanisms for coordinating government supervision, and guide the compliance operation of shadow banking.
Graphical Abstract
Evolutionary Game Simulation Analysis of Government Supervision of Shadow Banking in China
Keywords
Shadow banking
Government supervision
Evolutionary game
Simulation
Funding
This work was supported without any funding.
References
  1. Krugman P. Out of the Shadows[J]. New York Times, 2009, 19.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Tarnanidou, C. I. (2016). EU financial collateral arrangements and re-hypothecation in the shadow of ‘shadow banking’: To further regulate or not?. Journal of Banking Regulation, 17, 200-238.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Elliott, D., Kroeber, A., & Qiao, Y. (2015). Shadow banking in China: A primer. Economic Studies at Brookings, 3(2015), 1-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Grillet-Aubert, L., Haquin, J. B., Jackson, C., Killeen, N., & Weistroffer, C. (2016). Assessing shadow banking–non-bank financial intermediation in Europe. ESRB: Occasional Paper Series, (2016/10).
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kodres, L. E. (2013). What is shadow banking. Finance and Development, 50(2), 42-43.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Yang, L., van Wijnbergen, S., Qi, X., & Yi, Y. (2019). Chinese shadow banking, financial regulation and effectiveness of monetary policy. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 57, 101169.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Xu, M. (2023). The Coordination Between Macro-Prudential Supervision and Monetary Policy—From the Perspective of Financial Stability. Frontiers in Management Science, 2(4), 60-79.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Thiemann, M., Birk, M., & Friedrich, J. (2018). Much Ado About Nothing? Macro-Prudential Ideas and the Post-Crisis Regulation of Shadow Banking. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie (KZfSS), 70(1).
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cai, J., & Wang, A. (2022, December). Shadow Bank Scale and Financial Risk Prevention and Control Ability An Empirical Study Based on Principal Component Analysis. In 2022 International Conference on mathematical statistics and economic analysis (MSEA 2022) (pp. 107-114). Atlantis Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhang, J., & Xu, L. (2023). Local supervision of Chinese shadow banking. Journal of Banking Regulation, 24(3), 337-356.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Liu, X. (2014). Shadow banking in China. Banking & Finance Law Review, 30(1), 127.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Schwarcz, S. L. (2011). Regulating Shadow Banking: Inaugural Address for the Inaugural Symposium of the Review of Banking & Financial Law. Rev. Banking & Fin. L., 31, 619.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Pellegrini, C. B., Cincinelli, P., Meoli, M., & Urga, G. (2022). The role of shadow banking in systemic risk in the European financial system. Journal of Banking & Finance, 138, 106422.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hachem, K. (2018). Shadow banking in China. Annual review of financial economics, 10, 287-308.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Friedman, D. (1991). Evolutionary games in economics. Econometrica: journal of the econometric society, 637-666.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Wan, X., Xiao, S., Li, Q., & Du, Y. (2021). Evolutionary policy of trading of blue carbon produced by marine ranching with media participation and government supervision. Marine Policy, 124, 104302.
    [Google Scholar]
Cite This Article
APA Style
Li, R., Yang, J., & Yan, Y. (2024). Evolutionary Game Simulation Analysis of Government Supervision of Shadow Banking in China. IECE Transactions on Social Statistics and Computing, 1(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.62762/TSSC.2024.775392
Article Metrics
Citations:

Google Scholar
0

Crossref

0

Scopus

0

Web of Science

0
Article Access Statistics:
Views: 660
PDF Downloads: 116
Publisher's Note
IECE stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Institute of Emerging and Computer Engineers (IECE) or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
IECE Transactions on Social Statistics and Computing

IECE Transactions on Social Statistics and Computing

ISSN: 2996-8488 (Online)

Email: [email protected]

Portico

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:
https://www.portico.org/publishers/iece/

Copyright © 2024 Institute of Emerging and Computer Engineers Inc.